The Creative Commons has a FAQ on the Lawsuit Against Virgin Mobile and Creative Commons.
The story in a nutshell: Virgin Mobile used an image that a photographer had posted to Flickr using a CC license and did not give him attribution. He’s now suing Virgin Mobile, as you’d expect, but also Creative Commons because he didn’t understand the license.
How stupid is this guy? The licenses are very well explained and there’s no requirement that you use them (and Flickr defaults to regular copyright). If you attach a CC license without understanding it, why is it Creative Commons’ fault?

This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

















